Comparison
Peec AI is unusually straight about this, which makes the comparison easy: its own product page says it handles the research, analysis and prioritisation so you know exactly what to build, and that you keep full creative control over execution. If you have people to execute, Peec at $95 a month is the whole answer and you should stop reading. If you do not, the same gap gets reported to you every month and nothing about it changes.
| How the two differ | GetMOW | Peec AI |
|---|---|---|
| Who does the work | We take the earned media gaps, contact the publishers, make the editorial case and report the outcome per target. The deliverable is a changed page rather than a task on a list. | You. Peec puts it plainly on its own product page: “Actions handles the research, analysis, and prioritization so you know exactly what to build and where to focus. But you keep full creative control over execution.” Its September 2026 launch post adds that Actions does not write content for you or auto-generate listicles. |
| Off-site work | The whole product. We target the specific roundups, comparison pages, review site categories and directories carrying your category’s answers, and we work on position inside those pages rather than presence somewhere on them. | Identified, prioritised and handed back. Peec’s Off-Page actions cover editorial coverage, community discussions and reference sources where you need to engage or get featured, and its gap analysis names the sources that appear often and mention competitors but not you, by domain, subdomain and URL. Peec also runs a directory of partner agencies for the doing. |
| What it costs | Engagements start at €5,000, which buys a 49 day proof phase: the baseline, the map of the sources shaping your category’s answers, the plan, and one qualifying mention on a relevant third-party site that neither of us owns. Miss that mention by day 49 and the €5,000 is returned in full. Past the proof phase the implementation is quoted before it starts, and two payments across the first year fall due only once the target attached to each has been verified. | Genuinely cheap and transparent. As published by Peec in July 2026: Starter $95 a month for 50 prompts, one project and one country; Pro $245 a month for 150 prompts and three countries; Advanced $495 a month for 350 prompts. Daily tracking and unlimited users on every tier, Enterprise custom. Extra AI models are add-ons at $35, $85 and $165 a month by tier. |
| Seats | Not a thing you buy. The dashboard is included with the engagement rather than priced by seat, but it is scoped to the work itself rather than the kind of team-wide analytics access Peec’s unlimited seats give you. | A real strength. Unlimited users on every tier with no per-seat fee, so the marketing team, the founder and sales can watch the same numbers without a licensing conversation. Agencies get unlimited client workspaces and a free seven-day pitch project. |
| Measurement | A dashboard comes with the engagement: your visibility score, what has changed on each target, and the approval workflow for every pitch before it goes out. The free category report is the one-off version of the same read, before you are a client. It does not replace Peec’s own daily tracking, which is the other half of this row. | Sound, and honestly described. Peec’s documentation states that it uses UI scraping technology to interact with AI platforms exactly as real users do, capturing the same responses users see rather than API output. Daily tracking on every self-serve tier, plus source classification, share of voice, crawlability and AI referrals. |
| Focus | B2B software only, and the target lists are built from what decides those categories specifically: Overthink Group found 70.8% of citations on B2B software prompts go to pages with “best” or “top” in the title, and Reddit accounts for 1.4%. | Horizontal, and successfully so. Peec’s named customers run from Zalando, Hugo Boss and TUI to Attio, Brevo and n8n. That breadth is a strength in a tool. It is a limitation only if what you wanted was a supplier with an opinion about your category. |
| Risk of buying from us | High on paper. GetMOW is new, unfunded and unproven in public. What we put against that is the refund at day 49 and a method you can check: named URLs, your position on each, and the page diffs. | Low for a company founded in 2025. A $21M Series A in November 2025 led by Singular, with TechCrunch reporting more than $4M ARR ten months after launch, and $10M annualised revenue by May 2026 on dashboard data it verified. |
| Running both | The default recommendation. Peec’s Off-Page actions become the work queue, our own dashboard tracks the approval workflow and the change log target by target, and Peec keeps running its own read alongside it. No switching, and the tool costs a fraction of the engagement. | Designed for it. Peec runs a partner directory precisely to connect its customers with agencies doing the execution, and its own comparison page notes that recommendations, exports and prompt suggestions are in the Starter plan, so $95 a month is enough to feed a programme. |
A B2B software company where the Off-Page actions list has been sitting in Peec for a quarter because the content lead is booked, nobody owns publisher relationships, and pitching an editor is not anyone’s job. You want the roundups that decide your shortlist actually changed, argued editorially rather than bought, and you would rather pay for the doing than for another view of the same problem.
Peec alone is the better purchase in several real cases. If you have a content lead, a technical SEO and somebody who can pitch publishers, prioritisation is the only thing missing and Peec supplies it from $95 a month, where paying an agency for the doing would be waste. If you want the whole team watching the same numbers, unlimited users with no per-seat fee are unusual and materially cheaper than per-seat rivals. If you are an agency, Peec is a supplier rather than a rival. And if you are not yet sure the problem is real, $95 for one month answers that far more cheaply than hiring anyone.
Every factual claim on this page was read from these pages in September 2026.
Before you choose anyone, including us, see the answer ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity give today when a buyer asks who to consider in your category. Free, written by hand, and yours whatever you do next.